Discussion in 'Introductions and Farewells' started by Bob 2 Electric Boogaloo, Jan 31, 2014.
Yes, this is like Roblox all over again. Kind of ironic since IZ was made to escape the dictatorship of the mods on that site.
Well, pain made the rule so, he does have the authority to do that.
So? George Washington and others wrote the Constitution, does that give them the right to disobey it? No.
Did whites and blacks drink from the same fountain back then, No. The rule said they couldn't. MLK broke the rules but it was awesome that he did....... u got smoked leleleleleelel
But did MLK make the rules? No. Therefore your logic is invalid.
Yet your bot to welcome new members can do that. What kind of logic is that?
I mean, if you trust the person, and they follow the rules, then when he makes a alt. but docent do anything bad..........Its not really rule breaking
There's that whole 'grandfathered in' thing, where an account made before the ban can stay until it gives a specific reason to be banned, although once that alt is banned at all it's gone permanently.
Anyways, I'll give you a chance to respond to this post, but I'm probably going to be locking this thread soon so flamewar doesn't spread like a forest fire.
Still, this is an alt and not a post. An alt can be banned with no repercussions; however banning a person over a post they made before the rule is just stupid. That is my 2 cents before this thread closes.
Wait can you explain what you meant with the "banning a person over a post they made before the rule."?
I don't really get what you are referring to there.
Say there was a rule made against making AMA threads because people spammed the forum with them. You wouldn't ban the people for making those threads after a rule was made saying "No more AMA threads".
Well of course, only the threads themselves would be deleted, and the person would possibly be warned, which is what happened here. An alt was made, and the alt was deleted.
So the thread was deleted, so in that case wouldn't the alt be deleted? Both had rules against them, and the alt and the thread are the same thing in this case.
Oh wait I misunderstood you earlier. Only the threads made after the rule is declared would be deleted. The earlier threads would stay, unless something happened in them which would cause them to be locked or deleted.
Still, the fact that someone can get away with an alt account is bad. It was banned for a reason and no one account should be an exception. Plus all Steve does is make unfunny shitposts outside of the Asylum.
If this was anywhere near Roblox I'd have banned you for speaking against me.
The whole Bob joke is dead, just leave it alone and don't whine so much about it.
Steve actually follows the rules and posts in the Asylum now so it's not a problem
Still, what point does an unfunny shitposting alt serve? His posts are useless and serve no purpose, plus there is a rule against alts so he is setting a bad example.